Texas v. White, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 700 (1869), was a case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1869. The case involved a claim by the Reconstruction government of Texas that United States bonds owned by Texas since 1850 had been illegally sold by the Confederate state legislature during the American Civil War. The state filed suit directly with the United States Supreme Court, which, under the United States Constitution, retains original jurisdiction on certai… WebThe case was Texas v. White. The state of Texas brought suit in the United States Supreme Court to have certain United States government bonds declared the property of the state, and to prevent the present holders of the bonds from collecting upon them. Texas had owned the bonds before the Civil War.
U.S. Supreme Court - Northern Virginia Community College
WebSCOTUS 2004 does NOT say, "the question whether a state could secede was unresolved prior to Texas v White." Scalia does not write, "the constitutional issue resolved by Texas v White is that there is no right to secede." The Alaska court does not say, "a state's ability to secede was unsettled before Texas v White." What they all mention is ... WebTEXAS v. WHITE TEXAS v. WHITE: A STUDY ON THE MERITS OF THE CASE John 1. Templin* O ANNEXATION TO SECESSION N March 1, 1845, by a Joint Resolution of the … performance\u0027s vf
What is Texas V. White? Zadeh Firm
Web26 Nov 2013 · On April 15, 1869, Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase announced a ruling in favor of Texas on the grounds that the Confederate government had no legal existence, and that Texas, since its admission in 1845, was part of “an indestructible union, composed of indestructible states. WebSTATE OF TEXAS v. WHITE, 74 U.S. 700 (1868) 74 U.S. 700 (Wall.) TEXAS v. WHITE ET AL. December Term, 1868 The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court. ... Such is a brief outline of the case. It will be necessary hereafter to refer more in detail to some particular circumstances of it. WebBrief Fact Summary. Wheeler (Plaintiff) and White (Defendant) formed a contract under which White was to borrow money for a construction project on Wheeler’s behalf, in exchange for money and a commission on rentals. Wheeler relied on White’s promise he would get the money, but White never secured the loan. Synopsis of Rule of Law. performance\u0027s rt